A blog about life in the hottest and holiest region in the world.

Are Arab Leaders Really So Unhappy to See Ahmadinejad Re-elected?

So far most Arab leaders have reacted to the Iranian electoral crisis in typical Middle Eastern fashion: they haven't. Amir Moussa, the head of the Arab League, took one for the team and made this non-statement statement: "We hope that the next term will witness progress on the relations between Iran and the Arab world and co-operation in establishing peace in the Middle East." Other than such empty formalities, there has been an awkward silence from most Arab capitals.

Which is no doubt pragmatic. Tensions between Iran and much of the Arab world are already bad enough. Ever since the American invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, America's Arab allies -- especially Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia -- have been ringing the alarm bell about the rise of Iranian power in the Middle East. Besides the age-old animosity between these mostly Sunni Muslim countries and their ethnic and sectarian rivals in Shia Muslim Persia, they worry that Iran's support for radical anti-Israeli and anti-American groups in the region is destabilizing their hold on their own countries, who populations are less moderate than their governments.

So on the surface at least, the surprise victory of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would seem to be a blow to the Arab countries circling the wagons against Iran. But it may actually make their job much easier.

Like the Israeli right and neo-conservatives in America, the leaders of moderate Arab states have been concerned that the Obama Administration's plans to engage Iran would leave them out in the cold. But with Ahmadinejad returning to power, it's going to be much easier for them to keep their fingers pointed at the Islamic Republic. Although the policies of the defeated reform candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi would not have been much different from Ahmadinejad's, and though Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei controls foreign policy, Ahmadinejad, with his Holocaust denials and his outspoken support for Iran's nuclear program, is the poster boy of the Persian threat.

And in fact, an Ahmadinejad victory tainted by allegations of fraud by Iran's defeated reformers may be the best of all outcomes. One of the reasons that Saudi Arabia and other Arab governments are afraid of Iran is that for all the flaws of the Islamic Republic's clerical democracy, Iran's citizens have much more of a voice and effect on their country's power structure than do the citizens of Arab dictatorships, according to Mohammad Al-Qahtani, a reform advocate and economics professor at the Saudi foreign ministry's diplomatic training institute, whom I met today. "Iran's power comes from its democracy," he said. Watching Iran's democracy self-combust is enough to make an Arab oligarch smile.

--Andrew Lee Butters/Riyadh

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (7)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Andrew,
    Can you confirm these Twitter postings by Iranians in Iran stating that militia have been called in from Lebanon and Syria to battle the protesters?
    .
    Also, I can't agree with you more. It's obvious that anything damning to the Iranian public image is a plus for the Arab and Israeli governments (for various reasons). Conventional wisdom dictated that if Khamenei were to rig the elections, it would have been for Mousavi, thereby doing exactly what he accuses the US of doing: putting a prettier face on the same policies. However, we found out that it was not so cut and dry. Khamenei's demons, for instance, prevented him from siding with Mousavi of the Rafsanjani/Khatami camp, a feud as old as the revolution. He aligned, instead, with Ahmadinejad.

  • 2

    [...] Are Arab Leaders Really So Unhappy to See Ahmadinejad Re-elected? Posted on June 15, 2009 by theolounge So far most Arab leaders have reacted to the Iranian electoral crisis in typical Middle Eastern fashion: they haven’t. Amir Moussa, the head of the Arab League, took one for the team and made this non-statement statement: “We hope that the next term will witness progress on the relations between Iran and the Arab world and co-operation in establishing peace in the Middle East.” Other than such empty formalities, there has been an awkward silence from most Arab capitals. > more. [...]

  • 3

    I agree. A win for the reformists in Iran would send chills to the spines of Arab governments. No wonder they would be happy to see Ahmadinejad violently crushes his opponents even if they dislike him. He makes their jobs easier.

  • 4

    Saying that Ahmadinejad winning is good for the Israeli and Arab governments may be true for the far-right politically, but seems to me to be like the old proverb of 'cutting off your nose to spite your face' - and it is definitely not better for the general population of those countries.
    .
    When I heard about the election I was deeply saddened. Obama being elected was a window of opportunity for Iran to engage with the West, and it genuinely seemed like comments about the youth of Iran speaking out against the confrontational rhetoric of Ahmadinejad were true (and represented a chance to show the world that the Iranian threat was overstated and false). Unfortunately, just like Bibi winning the election in Israel tied everyone's hands to some degree for real progress towards peace, so too will this election set Iran back for years diplomatically.
    .
    I personnaly do not believe that the vast majority of Americans, Israelis, Iranians, or Arabs want a major conflict, but I am afraid that this pretty much seals all of our fates. What a shame. Hopefully Persianadvocate and others are able yell loudly enough that no number of police officers with batons can silence them.
    .
    Good luck.

  • 5

    [...] of the US and Israel brings me to my third conclusion: Ahmadinejad’s disputed election is in terms of diplomacy the best possible outcome for almost .... The neighboring Arab autocracies can point to the current troubles of the Islamic Republic (whose [...]

  • 6

    Arabs are unhappy to see Ahmadinejad reelected? Sure because they want to be the only dictators in the area. Do dictators really get along with each other? Don't think so when it comes to sharing power. Shiites and suunis will never, I repeat never share power, they would rather be at war with each other. With Ahmadinejad re-elected, {and yes I do believe he may have had the majority vote considering that millions of poor votes were in his favor. Think about it, 80% of Iranians are poor in Iran.} war in the Middle east is inevitable in the next four years. Sorry, but that's the way the "divine wants it". Don't you know that it is written of this war in the scriptures? That is of cource if you believe in the scriptures which I doubt Obama does. This man is flying blind.

  • 7

    Nick,

    Why do you think Khemeni would rig the elections in favor of Mousavi? It is because they are distant cousins? I think the Supreme Leader would want a president who he can manage, and who is more pliable? In addition, I think Obama makes the Mullahs nervous and they want someone who appears to be a tough negotiator. While I am sure Mousavi can hold his own, he does not give the appearance of being "tough". The Mullahs probably want a hot head like Ahmadjinejad, in order to appear to be moderates.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Middle East Blog Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Middle East Blog in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
CORINNA LANKFORD, one of the 10 American Baptists who are detained in Haiti on child-trafficking charges