-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Obama in Cairo: The Making of a Prophet?
President Obama's speech in Cairo today is the most important address ever given by an American leader about the Middle East. As he told 1,000 people at Cairo University and millions more around the world, everything won't be solved by a speech. Yet it was an unprecedented reach-out to Muslims and particularly to the Arab world. Far more than any other U.S. president in the past, he both acknowledged harmful Western policies during the Colonial and Cold War eras and promised an intense personal effort to resolve the region's problems and build a new era based on mutual cooperation and respect. The clear message Obama delivered—in his words, body language and statement of policies-- was that America is determined to be part of the solution in the Middle East. He didn't arrive or depart as a prophet, but for an American president treading into territory inhospitable to U.S. policies, he won some new adherents.
The audience responded to Obama's fine rhetoric and frequent quotations from the Koran with repeated applause. At the end as he stood on the stage and waved, a group of Egyptian students in the balcony rhythmically began chanting, “He's our man! He's our man!” When Obama spoke about democracy during the speech, one man in the audience shouted, “We love you!” But the audience also responded well to Obama's specifics, including a statement opposing Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian West Bank—an unusually strong display of criticism of America's ally, given that it was delivered from the heart of an Arab capital. When I asked him what he liked about the speech, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit, who personally welcomed Obama at Cairo International Airport a few hours earlier, told me: “Everything.” Agreed Mahmoud Essam, 14, a student at Towfeyeh school in Shubra, who also attended the speech: “All of it was fantastic.”
As he has done on other occasions, Obama shepherded credibility by pointing to his own Islamic roots. Even as he openly declared himself to be a Christian, he spoke proudly about the generations of Muslims in his father's Kenyan family, and of his own experience attending school as a boy in Indonesia, the largest Muslim country. What characterized Obama's speech as something fresh was its straight talk, an apparent attempt to win further political credit by acknowledging past U.S. policies that were detrimental and then to use that credit to demand better attitudes and actions from the Middle East as well. Obama recounted U.S. mistakes after 9/11, such as the invasion of Iraq, the establishment of the Guantanamo prison and use of torture against Muslim prisoners. But he called on Muslims to abandon the stereotype that everything America represents and does is bad, and physically bristled at the notion, still widespread in the Arab world, that the al-Qaeda attack on the U.S. in 2001 was somehow justifiable.
The straight talk enabled Obama to glide through a minefield of competing interests. He appealed to governments (and equally to the Arab street) with his strong opposition to Israeli settlements and his demand that the region's leaders accept the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Although he began by reaffirming America's unbreakable bond with Israel and his demand that Hamas cease terrorist attacks, it was a clear elbow in the direction of Israel's right-wing leader, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who favors settlements and opposes Palestinian independence. But he also won plaudits from many citizens and earned frowns from autocrats with his frank, forceful call for democracy, human rights and women's rights in Arab countries—and a warning to Arab regimes not to use the conflict with Israel to divert attention from needed domestic reforms. Obama continued his reach-out to the Iranian regime; he acknowledged Iran's right to nuclear energy while linking his opposition to it's nuclear program to fears about proliferation and escalating threats that would endanger Iranians as well.
Obama came to Cairo as part of the “conversation” with the Muslims that he started in his inaugural address, when he envisioned a new relationship based on mutual interest and respect. “This cycle of suspicion and discord must end,” he declared at Cairo University. Without a doubt, he now has the Islamic world listening.
--By Scott MacLeod/Cairo
-
1
Mr. MacLeod wrote:
What characterized Obama's speech as something fresh was its straight talk, an apparent attempt to win further political credit by acknowledging past U.S. policies that were detrimental and then to use that credit to demand better attitudes and actions from the Middle East as well.
________________________________________Exactly! and this is what Obama's critics on the right do not understand or refuse to understand.
Obama is not on any apology kick to trash this country to other nations. He prefaces the hard truths of other countries stereotyping and dislike for us with acknowledging some things we have done that was not so nice before he takes the critics to task for their own roles.
He does it to give credibility to his arguments and to let the countries know he is not just trashing them and then thinking we are so perfect.
What the right does not understand is that you can love your country and acknowledge it's flaws and love it despite that. -
2
I guess with so many issues, its very easy to harp on one's own personal agenda rather than the whole of President Obama's speech.
.
.
It's dissapointing, but hardly surprising that Scott completely ignores the responsibilities and obligations he places on the Muslim world. Indeed, while Scott mentions Israel and the West Bank settlements no fewer than three times, he remains completely silent about Egypt's own issues with its Coptic Christian community.
.
.
So too his deminimus commentary on the obligations of rejectionist-extremist groups like HAMAS. Scott seems to have misplaced Obama's idea(l) of MUTUAL, interests and respect in favor of flag waving. -
3
[...] fact that Obama made such a speech in Cairo at all was historic, Time's Scott MacLeod says. “President Obama’s speech in Cairo today is the most important address ever given by [...]
-
4
[...] This is another one from Times.com. [...]
-
5
Isn't it ironic that a speech about refusing stereotypes elicits a post from a commenter who engages in them, e.g., vwcat?
•
Speaking as someone on the right, I thought the speech as very fine rhetoric. Obama and the speechwriter are definitely familiar with Aristotle's On Rhetoric, especially the part about know your audience. By admitting past U.S. mistakes and extolling some of the virtues of the Islamic world, Obama can ingratiate himself to his audience so they will be more open to be persuaded to accept presumably mistake-free U.S. policy. But aside from that tactic, which has rarely been used by a U.S. president, the speech's emphasis wasn't much different than Bush's or Clinton's policies.
•
--Iran shouldn't have nuclear weapons--check. --No more Israeli settlements--check (Condoleeza Rice said the same thing, but it does mean more coming from the top). --Hamas should reject violence--check. --The Muslim world should reject extremism--check. --America isn't as bad as you've been led to believe--check. --9/11 wasn't the U.S.'s just desserts or a conspiracy--check. --The U.S. and Israel have a special bond--check.
•
None of this is new, it's just the packaging that has changed. I hope the packaging will be enough to persuade some in the ME to the U.S.'s way of thinking. But in the end, talk is talk and actions are what count. The reactions to the speech from Hezbollah, Hamas, Iran, and others in the ME who oppose U.S. policy could be quotes extracted from the past three decades. Yahoo's reacations. In other words, the ones who are the biggest obstacles to U.S. policy are the ones who weren't/can't be persuaded.
•
I still sincerely doubt how effective any U.S. president can be in resolving or reducing ME conflict. No Western leader can get Hamas and Fatah to stop shooting at each other. And until that happens, a two-state solution is unworkable because there is no leadership for a Palestinian state. (How about a three-state solution? Anyone?) And the current leadership of Hezbollah and Iran probably won't think a U.S. president is anything more than a blowhard until he or she abandons Israel and capitulates to Iran's and Hezbollah's worldview.
•
But Kudos to Obama on a good speech. Now it's time for actions to back up the words. -
6
Somethings I've learned as a manager, you have to be opinionated and decide upon wrongs and rights. The Muslim world is mostly WRONG they are backward and need to change for the sake of a billion Muslim men and women who are in majority: poor, oppressed and uneducated.
Trust me, I've got leftish views and some real Arab friends. Obama's speech was wonderful and praise worthy to a western ear but is very naive in terms of rights and wrongs. Having elections and getting repeatedly 99% votes to a single candidate is wrong (Egypt). Having sharia religious laws including flogging of "sexual deviates" and stoning of women is wrong (Saudi Arabia, Iran). Suicide bombers are wrong (Gaza, Indonesia, Pakistan, Iraq). Being nice isn't going to change that.
The unfortunate lesson from the past is that trying to force democracy doesn't work and may end up with extremist religious people taking power. It took the west centuries to reach the point that it is now, it will take the Arab/Muslim world a long time yet.
The things to do about it are delicate and small, they come in the form of shortwave radio, satellite TV and free internet. I sure hope Obama's speech is on the right track and will give the Muslim people some of the right and wrong senses they need to learn.
-
7
I suppose that it is inevitable that everyone, Scott included, will hear in a speech like this what he wanted to hear. Scott wanted President Obama to "elbow" the Netanyahu government, and so an elbow is what he got. But there was quite a bit in this speech that should reassure Israel, and its supporters in the U.S. He squarely addressed Muslim rejectionism, Palestinian violence, and the trope of Arab governments and peoples using the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as an excuse for ignoring other problems, including development and political reform.
.
Selected soundbites rarely do Obama justice, and they certainly don't this time. Since it was a long speech, and since electrons are free, I will take the liberty of quoting at length from the transcript posted on Time's website:
.
The second major source of tension that we need to discuss is the situation between Israelis, Palestinians and the Arab world.
.
America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.
.
Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. [I would add that cynically calling for "reevaluation" in lieu of outright denial is equally baseless, ignorant, and hateful-- asbestosagain.] Threatening Israel with destruction — or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews — is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.
.
On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people — Muslims and Christians — have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than sixty years they have endured the pain of dislocation. Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, and neighboring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead. They endure the daily humiliations — large and small — that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt: the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own.
.
For decades, there has been a stalemate: two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive. It is easy to point fingers — for Palestinians to point to the displacement brought by Israel's founding, and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history from within its borders as well as beyond. But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth: the only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security.
.
That is in Israel's interest, Palestine's interest, America's interest, and the world's interest. That is why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all the patience that the task requires. The obligations that the parties have agreed to under the Road Map are clear. For peace to come, it is time for them — and all of us — to live up to our responsibilities.
.
Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America's founding. This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia; from Eastern Europe to Indonesia. It's a story with a simple truth: that violence is a dead end. It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered.
.
Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build. The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern, with institutions that serve the needs of its people. Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have responsibilities. To play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, and to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, and recognize Israel's right to exist.
.
At the same time, Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.
.
Israel must also live up to its obligations to ensure that Palestinians can live, and work, and develop their society. And just as it devastates Palestinian families, the continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza does not serve Israel's security; neither does the continuing lack of opportunity in the West Bank. Progress in the daily lives of the Palestinian people must be part of a road to peace, and Israel must take concrete steps to enable such progress.
.
Finally, the Arab States must recognize that the Arab Peace Initiative was an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibilities. The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems. Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state; to recognize Israel's legitimacy; and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.
.
America will align our policies with those who pursue peace, and say in public what we say in private to Israelis and Palestinians and Arabs. We cannot impose peace. But privately, many Muslims recognize that Israel will not go away. Likewise, many Israelis recognize the need for a Palestinian state. It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true.
.
Too many tears have flowed. Too much blood has been shed. All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians can see their children grow up without fear; when the Holy Land of three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be; when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed (peace be upon them) joined in prayer. -
8
[...] [...]
-
9
I'd hate to have you as a manager astrolapithicus. You can't just call things right or wrong, you need to look at the underlying reasons to understand why. Bush had the same worldview, black or white. If one side is right, and one side is wrong, then how can you ever properly mediate a conflict? How would you negotiate in that case?
Saying that Arabs aren't ready for democracy is pretty much racist. The fact is, they're never given the opportunity. We all saw how the world reacted when Palestinians elected Hamas. Elections in Egypt are a complete joke because there's only party. Opposition leaders are imprisoned on trumped up charges, with only lip service from the US.
-
10
By the same token aaai, when "W"'s administration pushed democracy and free elections on Egypt, he was lambasted as an outsider who should butt out of Egypt's domestic policies.
.
.
Same thing happens in Saudia Arabia when the US pushed woman's rights.
.
.
Somehow, when it comes to individual human rights of Arabs and Muslims, in their own states, we become this blind ignoramous who missunderstands the culture and ethnic history that make their locales unique. Or, we're labeled some Western interloper who's using its power to manipulate the polity to its own ends. -
11
As anticipated, Barack Obama's speech in Cairo this morning has sparked a blogging frenzy focused on whether or not there was a positive impact on the Muslim world.
Instead of adding to the redundancy, I would like to talk about the investment our President made today in a new Middle East.
In college, I was fortunate enough to take an introductory negotiations course that covered a variety of famous political, religious, financial, and emotionally charged arbitrations. Although it is unnecessary to go into course specifics, it has been interesting to watch Barack Obama productively utilize negotiation tactics when handling the Middle East. As somebody with a Jewish heritage, it has been frustrating watching many Israeli Jews and American Jews quickly becoming critical of our new president's strategy for a peaceful solution. All too often, I hear about how Barack Obama is straining our current relationship with Israel. Instead I would like somebody to consider frustrations as the"growing pains" necessary for us to move beyond prior convictions and work our way back up to a "clean slate."
The Bush administration may have supported Israel in every way imaginable, but 8 years later we can only say that they maintained a status quo in the region. More importantly, unwavering support for Israel cost the United States one of its previously greatest assets; the ability to mediate between nations. When I watched Barack Obama's speech today, I could not find fault with his praise for Muslim achievements and scrutinizing of Israel's occupation of lands negotiated on in prior treaties. While I do believe that Islamic extremists have caused Americans to become increasingly weary of the Muslim faith, our inability to differentiate between extremists and the main stream religion have added to the fire and set the grounds for a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Before Barack Obama can think about negotiating a peace deal in the Middle East, he must first become a negotiator in the eyes of those who live there. Over the past 2 years, recognized agreements have failed because citizens did not believe that their leaders were making decisions in their best interests. A real peace will only happen when the average citizen fully understands where the other side is coming from, what compromises they have made, and why they are willing to make them. Only then can Muslims and Jews talk "human to human" at the negotiating table.
Today Barack Obama invested in the Middle East by sowing the seeds that will allow him to become a formidable, reliable, unbiased (as much as any American can be), and informative negotiator for all people of the region. When both Muslim and Jew can refer to Barack Obama as a source for understanding, explaining, and compromise, maybe then a few settlements will REALLY be worth the security and prosperity from everlasting peace. -
12
It's the hypocrisy of saying one thing and doing another that gets to people. If you're going to push democracy, then really push it. If you're going to put your foot down and force elections, then don't ostracize the government that people elect.
-
13
Good post Brooke. I too have high hopes for Obama.
-
14
[...] [...]
-
15
The Making of a Prophet ??
That would be pushing it !!
_Firstly there was not a single thing Obama said today that has not been said on the so-called Islamic hate blogs -
_But what is worrying - is that anyone who criticizes Islam - is labelled an "Islamophobe" and a "racist" - for saying almost word for word what Obama has said.
_I can even remember writing along with others - on one very popular anti-jihad blog - as to the fact that there are no Muslim Gandhi type figures - no Martin L Kings - or even Nelson Mandelas - and if Muslims wanted to solve the Palestinian crisis they would be better off - employing peaceful means - and that this would get them more international support.
Hey - but that's considered "hateful" and "racist" - except when Obama says it -
- and what's more in defence of Israel - what if the Blacks is America resorted to violence - 40 years ago - the Whites would have been forgiven - for erecting a wall (or barrier) of some sort - to protect themselves. And 40 years on - through peaceful means - the Blacks in America - well the President is Black - as a measure of progress - versus the utter devastating conditions the Palestinians live in - having achieved little or nothing over the same period.
_All while the Arabs build 'The World' and 'The Palm' employing almost no one (or so-called 'Arabs') from the region

_As far as I'm concerned Obama shouldn't be allowed to take credit - entirely - for what the blogs have been saying for years.
- Islam needs to revamp itself - and to free these people from this religious - tyranny.
That is why the bloggers are not listening - that is why they will keep going.
_Being accused of stereotyping Islam - is a little insulting - in that all you have to do is read the news -
In Pakistan - (CompassDirect) a Christian couple is being charged with the desecration of the Koran -- for having a Koran in their home -- they offered to hold some of the belongings for a neighbour in trouble - but when it was found - they may have touched his Koran - with unwashed hands - they were charged with blasphemy - which carries the death penalty - this was dropped for the lesser charge of defiling the Koran - for simply being non-Muslims in possession of a Koran.
_Yet Obama today - talked glowingly of the first American president with a Koran - in his library !!
_Obama said he was going to fight for the right of the Muslim woman to wear the headscarf!
-
But in Kuwait earlier this week - a group of man walked out of the parliament - in protest that some of the first ever elected women - did not have on a headscarf. These are fighting not to have to wear one!
_
Obama says my father was a Muslim -
One wonders if Obama only wants to hear good news from the Middle East - as any Egyptian - with a Muslim father - goes to church - and publicly admits that they are now Christian - will be put in prison - and there is nothing politically correct about it. In Egypt he and his children and his grandchildren will be forcibly - made to be Muslim - and they would be arrested and regularly tortured if they tried to go to church. (HRW)
_
I dear say - Obama and others (The Left) should respect what those critics of Islam are saying.
To perhaps stereotype all of Islam's critics is unfair as well.
_
Obama simply sugar coated - what many bloggers have been saying all along - the good thing is maybe Muslims will listen to him - as the bloggers are all 'haters' and 'racists' - oh.. did I forget - we believe ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS !!
_
In some ways the news is still of little comfort - the things mentioned above are sanctioned by Shari'a - and therefore many Muslims believe that this system of law and conduct is right for every country including the US - that's the point of Islamic jihad or terrorists actions! Also sanctioned by the Koran!! Luckily most Muslims are willing to try and bring the world under Islam peacefully - it is their religious duty!!
(see Jizya, Dar al-Islam, Dar al-Harb) -
16
Where do you come up with this stuff Cole? Talk about blanket statements about an entire region and religion...
Tell me, why was there no Jihad 50 years ago? Why is terrorism relatively new? (1970's onwards)
The underlying reasons are political and socio-economic, not religious. The entire basis for Islamic fundamentalists is that the the Arab world is the state it is in now because people aren't pious enough and are too Westernized. It's an absurd concept to grasp when you're well off and you have civil rights. It's an easy concept to grasp when you're dirt poor and oppressed.
If spreading Islam is such an important duty within the religion, why don't we see more Muslim missionaries all over the globe?
-
17
Moderate Muslims may as well not exist. They are invisible. I cannot believe all Muslims are not Islamists at heart unless they start saying so, and even then, they could be lying. I trust them as much as I trust Obama. Not at all. There's a reason people want to verify his citizenship status to determine if he is constitutionally eligible to be president: He early on demonstrated quite clearly that he lies. His performance as president has clearly demonstrated once again that he is a liar and is drunk on power.
-
18
[...] Points Obama in Cairo: The Making of a Prophet? - The Middle East Blog – TIME.com Scott [...]
-
19
[...] Obama in Cairo: The Making of a Prophet ? Posted on June 8, 2009 by theolounge President Obama’s speech in Cairo a few days ago is the most important address ever given by an American leader about the Middle East. As he told 1,000 people at Cairo University and millions more around the world, everything won’t be solved by a speech. Yet it was an unprecedented reach-out to Muslims and particularly to the Arab world. > more. [...]
-
20
LOL (!!!):
Most Popular »
- Undercover Boss Is Phony and Manipulative. But Don't Hold That Against It.
- NH Poll: Dems Face A Thumpin'
- Paul Ryan Won't Run For Prez In 2012
- Today's Health Care Checkup - GOP Plans Under the Spotlight
- Love At First Byte: Your Nerdy Valentine's Day Guide
- CO Gov Poll: Hickenlooper +4
- In The Spotlight, Paul Ryan Faces A Purity Test
- OH Gov Poll: Kasich Maintains Lead
- Driver's licenses for the Internet, Part 2
- Jack Murtha, 77, Dies
- Asian Carp Battle: Foreign Fish Threaten Great Lakes
- Al-Qaeda, Yemen, Wedding: Unlucky Name, Celebration
- Tea-Party Convention: Lessons on Palin and the Movement
- Is the Bible Fact or Fiction? Archaeology's Discoveries
- Venezuela: Chavez Protests at Ball Game Over Electricity
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Fears Over Euro Zone Outlook
- Who Were the First Americans?
- Why China Needs The U.S. -- And Vice Versa
- Marja: Operation Moshtarak Tests Obama's Afghan War Plan
- 'Black Hearts': On Green, Iraq's 'Triangle of Death'












RSS